Traditional soccer jersey numbers
As early as October 1897, those involved in the intrigue began to take action to protect Walsin-Esterházy. Items from the Dreyfus Affair. According to Begley, fear of losing office and dignities played a significant role for a number of the people involved. As if quotas say anything about a country's level of education. First, the historian Gabriel Monod wrote in an open letter published on November 4 that he, as a recognized handwriting expert, could confirm that the Bordereau was not written by Dreyfus. Henry would also have been able to suppress the Bordereau immediately after its discovery. During the subsequent official meeting with General Millet, Walsin-Esterházy tried to explain the similarity between his handwriting and that of Bordereau by saying that Dreyfus had imitated his handwriting. on the 7thOn November 10, a stockbroker who happened to acquire one of the Bordereau's facsimiles identified the manuscript as that of his client Walsin-Esterházy. The preliminary investigations against Walsin-Esterházy ended on December 3, 1897. In the final report, the investigator General de Pellieux concluded that there was no evidence to support the accusations made by Dreyfus or Picquart against Walsin-Esterházy. Another article followed on December 1 under the headline Le Syndicat (The Syndicate), which took up the repeated allegation that a Jewish syndicate was trying to buy an acquittal from Alfred Dreyfus.
The first round was very much dominated by the defenders, twelve of whom were selected in the first round and seven in the top 15 alone. Twelve defeats in a row for SpVgg Greuther Fürth mean a new negative record (3rd to 14th matchday). Both Begley and Blum point out that a series of deceptions began very early in the affair: deception to cover up the previous deception and lying to make the last lie credible. He pointed out that submitting a request for correction after serious mistakes should not be considered an attack on the army. Leblois had asked Scheurer-Kestner not to come forward on Picquart's behalf until further evidence unrelated to Picquart was available. Scheurer-Kestner contradicted this statement in a speech before the Senate on December 7, 1897. Now without a newspaper willing to print his articles, Zola published his next two articles as pamphlets on December 13 and 14, 1897, but these sold poorly because of their high price of 50 centimes each. on the 5thOn December 10, Zola, in the article Le Procès-verbal (taking stock), expressed his hope that a military court trial of Walsin-Esterházy would reconcile the nation and put an end to the barbaric anti-Semitism that was setting France back a thousand years.
He accused du Paty, Mercier, Billot, Gonse and Boisdeffre of masterminding a plot, accused the "dirty press" of anti-Semitic propaganda and again accused Walsin-Esterházy of being the real traitor to the country. On du Paty's orders, Henry forged one of one alleged Espérance, informing Walsin-Esterházy of the status of Picquart's investigation and warning that the "syndicate" would accuse him of being the true traitor to the country. Almost simultaneously with Scheurer-Kestner's statement, in an open letter to Minister of War Billot, Mathieu Dreyfus accused Walsin-Esterházy of being the author of the Bordereau. When letters to War Secretary Billot and Chief of Staff Boisdeffre went unanswered, Walsin-Esterházy also wrote to French President Félix Faure, a moderate Republican who opposed the retrial of Dreyfus had spoken. As Walsin-Esterházy expected, the National Security Police intercepted both telegrams and forwarded them to Henry, Gonse, and Minister of War Billot. All of the military judges who ruled on Walsin-Esterházy knew that their Minister of War, to the applause of the deputies, had confirmed that Dreyfus had been rightly convicted.
Walsin-Esterházy claimed in his letter that a "veiled lady" stole the photographic copy of this document from Picquart, who in turn stole it from an embassy. In the first days of November 1897, Walsin-Esterházy sent two telegrams and a letter to Picquart. At a secret meeting on October 22, 1897, barcelona jersey 2025/26 du Paty and another member of the Walsin-Esterházy General Staff pledged their support. The first article appeared in the newspaper Le Figaro on November 15, 1897 and dealt with Scheurer-Kestner's efforts to clean up the miscarriage of justice. He denounced this already in March 1896 in his article Pour les Juifs (For the Jews), but he did not mention the case of Dreyfus. A rag doll bearing the name of Mathieu Dreyfus is burned on Paris' Place Blanche during the riots following the release of J'accuse. For his next publication, Zola turned to the literary journal L'Aurore (The Sunrise), newly founded by Georges Clemenceau: on January 13, 1898, his open letter to President Félix Faure J'accuse appeared on the front page…